Answers ยท Infinite Banking
Is whole life insurance a good investment?
Judged only as an investment, whole life usually comes up short. Cash value returns tend to land in the low single digits over decades, and they are negative in the early years, because the insurance costs come out first. It makes sense for a narrower job: coverage you need for your whole life, plus a conservative, tax deferred savings bucket you can fund for decades.
Judged as an investment alone, whole life usually loses.
Every premium dollar pays for several things before any of it becomes savings. The death benefit has to be paid for. The policy has running costs. The agent gets a commission, and most of it is paid in the first year. What is left builds cash value.
An index fund or a bond fund has costs too, but nowhere near that size, and nothing is pulled out to buy life insurance. So if the only question is which one grows your money faster, whole life almost never wins over a long stretch.
Quick note on who is talking. opfinances.com is a licensed insurance agency, and we sell whole life. We are not a financial advisor and not a fiduciary. This is general education, not advice about your situation.
The dividend rate in the pitch is not your return.
A lot of whole life marketing leads with the insurer's dividend rate, often a number around five or six percent. That rate is not what your money earns. It is a figure the company uses to work out dividends, and it applies after the insurance costs have already come out.
The honest number is the internal rate of return on your cash value. That compares what you paid in with what you could walk away with in a given year. In the first several years it is negative, because the cash value sits below what you have paid. For a policy held twenty or thirty years, illustrations commonly show something in the low to middle single digits.
And that figure usually comes from the non guaranteed column, which assumes today's dividend scale holds for the rest of your life. Dividends are not guaranteed. The guaranteed column shows a lower number, and any guarantee in the policy depends on the claims paying ability of the insurer that issues it.
Buy term and invest the difference wins on paper, if you really do both halves.
Term life covers you for a set stretch, often 20 or 30 years, and costs a fraction of whole life for the same death benefit. Put the difference into a diversified portfolio every year for decades and, historically, the portfolio has ended up ahead of the cash value. It also comes with market risk the cash value does not have.
That plan has two weak spots. The first is people. Plenty of people buy the term and spend the difference. The second is time. A term policy ends, and if you still need coverage at 70, buying new coverage at that age is expensive or impossible if your health has turned.
So be honest about which version of you shows up. Whole life only loses to the stock market if you actually invest that difference every year.
What you are actually buying is a contract, a tax treatment, and a death benefit.
Cash value grows tax deferred. Policy loans are generally not taxed while the policy stays in force, as long as it was designed to stay under the tax code's funding limit. The death benefit generally reaches your beneficiaries free of income tax. And the cash value does not drop when the stock market does.
That makes the savings part behave more like a conservative, long term bond holding than like a stock investment. For some people that is exactly the point. They already own plenty of stocks and want a bucket that holds steady, with life insurance attached.
It fits a narrow set of people, and you can usually tell if you are one of them.
Whole life tends to fit when the need for coverage really is lifelong. Think of a child who will always depend on you, an estate that will need cash to settle, or a business partner buyout. It also fits people who already put the maximum into their 401(k) and IRA, have steady income, and can fund a policy for fifteen years or more without strain.
It tends not to fit when you only need coverage while the kids are young or the mortgage is open, when cash flow is tight, when you may need the money within a few years, or when you are carrying high interest debt.
The worst result is quitting early, and the seller earns most when you buy big.
Surrender a whole life policy in the first few years and you usually get back less than you paid. Let a policy lapse with a loan still open and the gain inside it can become taxable income in a year you did not plan for. Both usually trace back to a policy that was bigger than the budget behind it.
Commission is tied mostly to base premium, so a bigger, base heavy policy pays the agent more. We sell these policies too. Apply every question below to us.
Before you decide
Questions worth asking.
What is the internal rate of return on the cash value at years 10, 20 and 30, on the guaranteed column and on the illustrated column?
What would the same death benefit cost as a 20 or 30 year term policy, and what is the yearly difference?
How much would I get back if I surrendered this policy in year three or year five?
Why do I need coverage for my whole life, rather than until a specific date?
What is your commission on this policy, and how would it change if less went to base premium?
If I take a policy loan and the policy later lapses, how much income tax could I owe?
Related
What is a good rate of return on whole life insurance?
There is no standard figure, so ask for the internal rate of return on the cash value rather than the dividend rate. It is negative in the early years. Policies held twenty or thirty years commonly illustrate low to middle single digits, and that illustration assumes dividends that are not guaranteed.
Is buy term and invest the difference better than whole life?
For most people who need coverage for a set number of years, it comes out ahead, as long as they really invest the difference every year and accept market risk. Whole life has the edge when the coverage need is lifelong or when health could make buying coverage later expensive.
Should I buy whole life insurance before maxing out my 401(k) or IRA?
Usually not. Most people do better capturing any employer match and funding their retirement accounts first. Whole life tends to make more sense after those, for someone who also has a lifelong need for coverage and the income to fund it for many years.
Do you lose money if you cancel a whole life policy?
In the early years, usually yes. The cash surrender value often sits below the premiums paid for the first several years, sometimes ten or more. If you surrender later for more than you paid in, the gain above your premiums is generally taxed as ordinary income.
Where this fits.
This question sits inside a bigger one. Infinite Banking walks through the whole decision rather than this one piece of it.
On Point Finances is a licensed insurance agency, not a tax, legal, or investment adviser. This page is general education, not a recommendation, and reading it does not create a client relationship.